Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-6300 - 137 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $92.56 vs $625.98
- Up to 83% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14600K - $0.77 vs $4.57 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.57/FPS
16%
Price, $
$625.98
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $625.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
120
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $92.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |