Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4459 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-2700K - 220 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $88.99 vs $180.49
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-14400F - $0.46 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
56%
Price, $
$180.49
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $180.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78239 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
193
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |