Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4146 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 56% better in New World than Core i5-2405S - 154 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $46.0 vs $242.17
- Up to 71% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13600KF - $0.46 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
29%
Price, $
$242.17
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9409 minutes ago
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |