Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-2100 - 217 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $49.0 vs $242.17
- Up to 74% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.29 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
25%
Price, $
$242.17
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10376 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10376 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |