Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1951 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i9-7960X - 160 vs 151 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $347.48 vs $899.99
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-13400F - $2.3 vs $5.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.62/FPS
40%
Price, $
$899.99
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17055 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
151
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$347.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $347.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |