Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 121 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $270.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-13400F - $2.23 vs $6.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.92/FPS
32%
Price, $
$899.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
121
93%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |