Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1942 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-7920X - 127 vs 112 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $557.04 vs $899.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-13400F - $4.97 vs $7.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.09/FPS
70%
Price, $
$899.99
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13681 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
112
88%
Value, $/FPS
$4.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$557.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |