Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Remnant II than FX-6200 - 97 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |