Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 3174 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 59% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6200 - 219 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - $42.85 vs $202.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 5800X - $0.31 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $202 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |