The FX-6200 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6200
The Core i9-12900K is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-12900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 6 threads
FX-6200 vs Core i9-12900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
213
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$315.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
FX-6200 vs Core i9-12900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
3-core
19%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 3 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
