The FX-6200 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 5700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6200
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 5700X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 6 threads
FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 5700X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, $
$159.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
3-core
38%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
