The FX-6200 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-660. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-660
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
FX-6200 vs Core i5-660 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
679
100%
Min 1% FPS
350
100%
Price, $
$27.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
FX-6200 vs Core i5-660 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Core i5-660 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Core i5-660 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
3-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-660 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Zambezi | Codename | Clarkdale |
125 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
Performance | ||
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |