Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3952 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-2400 - 145 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $34.95 vs $152.66
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-12600KF - $0.27 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
25%
Price, $
$152.66
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3322 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
128
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3322 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |