Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Celeron G6900 - 245 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $59.99 vs $152.66
- Up to 53% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-12600KF - $0.29 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
46%
Price, $
$152.66
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2988 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2987 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |