Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than Core i3-3240T - 760 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $25.7 vs $165.86
- Up to 82% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-11600KF - $0.04 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
760
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
18%
Price, $
$165.86
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18184 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
673
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |