Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2809 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 139 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
