Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $136.5 vs $529.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.84 vs $3.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11400 - 168 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2016 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
26%
Price, $
$529.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |