Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3122 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 195 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11260H | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |