Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-540 - 178 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $60.0 vs $141.45
- Up to 54% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10600K - $0.36 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 73 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
45%
Price, $
$141.45
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $141.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |