Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $60.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-6900K - $0.39 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 73 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-540 - 179 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |