Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3220 - 136 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $79.0 vs $143.7
- Up to 38% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10600K - $0.66 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
62%
Price, $
$143.7
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12251 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |