Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 31% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3240T - 580 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $25.7 vs $140.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600 - $0.06 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
443
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |