Buy on Amazon
$150
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $305
Availability
MSRP in USD: $305
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-4770S - 539 vs 525 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $115.74 vs $150.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-10600 - $0.22 vs $0.28 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i5-10600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8114 minutes ago
Core i7-4770S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
525
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-4770S Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.1 GHZ 8 MB Cache- BX80646I74770S
Buy for $115.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-4770S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
