Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 27% better in Rust than Core i3-3220 - 200 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - $91.98 vs $200.65
- Up to 41% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-10500 - $0.59 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $200.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47739 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
78.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
34.56221198156682%
Multi-Core
1085
19.83546617915905%
Intel Core i5-10500 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |