Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3974 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7500F - $91.98 vs $223.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 7500F - $0.25 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3220 - 481 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
374
77.75467775467776%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51032 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
481
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
53.191489361702125%
Price, $
$223.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $223.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
19.132653061224488%
Multi-Core
1085
8.608378292605522%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |