Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $79.0 vs $268.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13600K - $0.45 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 47% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3220 - 260 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 20 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8145 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
260
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
43%
Price, $
$268.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |