Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-950 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $100.0 vs $123.99
- Up to 14% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400 - $0.67 vs $0.78 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
85%
Price, $
$123.99
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $123.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |