Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 8% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 117 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $122.59 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 48 vs 12 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $122.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
86.36363636363636%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |