Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100T is 1461 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-5820K - 103 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $99.0 vs $429.95
- Up to 77% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-5820K - $0.96 vs $4.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3983 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
102
99.02912621359224%
Value, $/FPS
$4.22/FPS
22.748815165876778%
Price, $
$429.95
23%
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |