Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1487 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $99.0 vs $379.91
- Up to 71% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900K - $0.44 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-9100T - 251 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
223
88.84462151394422%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2427 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
29.13907284768212%
Price, $
$379.91
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $379.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
40.45057162071284%
Multi-Core
3178
15.773277744689299%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |