Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 2139 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-6300 - 298 vs 291 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $74.04 vs $99.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i3-9100T - $0.25 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |