Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100T is 2504 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i7-2700K - 55 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-2700K - $1.8 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $89.0 vs $99.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1771 minutes ago
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |