Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1808 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |