Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8121U outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8121U is 1335 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8121U
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 126 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 15 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8121U - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-8121U
Mobile • May 5th, 2018
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8121U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
May 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Cannon Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
