Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 471 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2600 - 129 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $85.76 vs $129.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-7300 - $0.67 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |