Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $129.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3600X - $0.47 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7300 - 279 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7069 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7070 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |