Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2583 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 24% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-6320 - 314 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 32 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$461.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $461.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |