Key Differences
In short — Core i3-560 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-560 is 885 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 23 than Phenom X4 9650 - 147 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 73 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $39.99 vs $60.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-560 - $0.31 vs $0.41 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
75.60975609756098%
Price, $
$60
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3673 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
130
88.43537414965986%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
53.72460496613996%
Multi-Core
765
82.08154506437768%
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |