Key Differences
In short — Core i3-560 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-560 is 827 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $49.0 vs $60.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-560 - $0.32 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 55 vs 73 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1590 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1592 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
92.32505643340858%
Multi-Core
723
77.57510729613733%
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |