Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2207 days newer than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i3-5015U - 266 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 8 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-5015U | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |