Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $48.5 vs $120.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10320 - $0.09 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-4370 - 575 vs 535 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
535
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2052 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2051 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |