Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4360 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $149.88 vs $249.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-12700F - $0.76 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than Core i3-4360 - 218 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 20 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
198
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9916 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
66%
Price, $
$249.99
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |