Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4360 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $149.88 vs $235.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-10700K - $0.28 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-4360 - 543 vs 526 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
526
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
543
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
65%
Price, $
$235.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |