Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-4170T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 895 days newer than Core i3-4170T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-4170T - 532 vs 519 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170T - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
532
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$557.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 30th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170T | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |