Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3089 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 49% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-4160T - 745 vs 501 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
745
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |