Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2178 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i3-4160T - 179 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$392.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $392.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |