Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1812 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Core i3-4160T - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |