Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2990 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $11.48 vs $399.06
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4160 - 136 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $11.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Buy for $399.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
35.77673167451244%
Multi-Core
2072
10.283899146317252%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |