Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3089 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $11.48 vs $319.99
- Up to 95% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-13700 - $0.09 vs $1.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 24% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-4160 - 168 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 24 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
135
80.35714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$11.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $11.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
4.736842105263158%
Price, $
$319.99
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
40.42553191489361%
Multi-Core
2072
14.038891523815977%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |