Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1551 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $254.12 vs $300.15
- Up to 93% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-9920X - $0.1 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i3-4160 - 204 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 24 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
201
98.52941176470588%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$254.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $254.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
6.802721088435375%
Price, $
$300.15
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
75.30077848549186%
Multi-Core
2072
21.944503283202714%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |